Rationale & Assumptions

Across the statelessness sector the issue of the lack of accurate statistics and information is prominent, serving as both the rationale behind the research undertaken in this report as well as the assumption that not all existing data used in the research may be accurate. In numerous consultations and meetings held by NFA between 2020–23, the issue of a lack of data was raised by both NGOs and UN bodies as a key concern. UNHCR has recognized this issue noting that their own estimate of 5.1 million stateless people globally is likely far below the true figure.

On this, UNHCR has noted that:

Yet, the global figure remains an undercount as data on stateless populations or those of undetermined nationality is missing or incomplete for many countries, including some with known stateless populations. The lack of reliable quantitative data continues to pose challenges to effectively address statelessness and advocate for solutions.

The Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion (ISI) estimates that there are at least 15 million stateless people globally. From our discussions and consultations, some of the key causes of this lack of statistical reporting on statelessness seem to be government hesitance and inaction to recognize stateless communities as well as practical difficulties of access and engaging with stateless communities. This means that gathering a clear picture of how many people are affected by statelessness and where they are located is in itself a very difficult process. This report aims to build knowledge and shed light on the Asia-Pacific which despite underreporting, reports the highest number of stateless people in the world. This report also acknowledges the existing initiatives to end statelessness and how heavily under-resourced they are. Through the continuation of this report in compendium and book versions, we hope to generate more attention and resources for such initiatives.